Skip to content

🧬 Spaces: The Living Cells of the MAP

In the MAP, we don’t build apps.
We form Spaces — living, membrane-bound contexts for meaningful coordination.

From Application-Centric to Space-Centric

Today’s digital systems are built around applications. Each app defines its own silo — with fixed boundaries, proprietary governance, its own database, and user-subordinate roles. If you form a group, that group must be recreated — often awkwardly — in each app you use. Worse, your data is held hostage: scattered across apps, owned by providers, fragmented from the whole.

In contrast, the MAP is space-centric.
Instead of bringing yourself and your data to an app, you bring the app to your Space.
In MAP:

  • Groups are primary. A group is an AgentSpace — sovereign and membrane-bound.
  • Governance is native. Each Space defines its own governance model — not imposed by apps.
  • Data is whole. All the data, relationships, and agreements of an app live inside your membrane.
  • Authentication flips. You don’t log into an app — the app earns the right to operate inside your Space, subject to your terms.

In the app world, you must authenticate your identity to them.
In the MAP, they prove their integrity to you.

The Cell as Metaphor

A Space in the MAP is like a living cell — the basic unit of sovereignty, agency, and relationship.

It has a membrane, through which trust, data, and value flow — governed by consent.

Within that membrane lies the internal anatomy of the Space:

  • A Life Code — purpose, values, governance, and identity
  • A Data Grove — knowledge, memories, and relationships
  • A set of Holons and Dances — what the Space can do
  • Assets — forms of Vital Capital temporarily stewarded within
  • The Governance Logic — roles, scaffolds, and protocols
  • Its own Visualizers — expressive ways to see, feel, and interact

Just as biological cells form tissues and organisms, Spaces form social, cultural, and technical organisms — multi-layered, living wholes that weave together people, ecosystems, tools, and traditions.

What Is an Agent?

An Agent is any entity capable of sensing and responding to its environment.

This includes:

  • Biological agents — people, whales, trees, watersheds
  • Social agents — co-ops, communities, bioregions
  • Technical agents — services, visualizers, bots

Each Agent has an I-Space — a private, membrane-bound domain where it holds its identity, stores its knowledge, governs its boundaries, and expresses its purpose.

And each AgentSpace can be a biological, cultural, social, and technical organism — with all those aspects co-present, co-evolving, and co-expressed through the same living membrane.

I-Spaces and We-Spaces

Every Agent has an I-Space — its own personal membrane, data grove, and Life Code.
This is where it expresses identity, manages consent, and stewards its own assets.

As relationships deepen and shared purpose emerges, We-Spaces arise.
These may be families, projects, movements, or bioregions — each one a distinct AgentSpace, capable of:

  • Defining its own governance
  • Holding and managing shared capital
  • Establishing agreements and trust channels
  • Adapting, learning, and evolving over time

We-Spaces are sovereign and persistent. They may also nest, forming holarchies of coordination — from person to pod to bioregion and beyond.

Agreements Open the Membrane

Spaces don’t interact by default.
They form Agreements — consent-based bundles of Promises that establish purpose, roles, permissions, and flows.

Each Agreement forms its own Agreement-Based AgentSpace, and in doing so, opens membrane gates between participants. These gates define:

  • What kinds of Vital Capital can flow (data, trust, labor, resources)
  • Under what terms and thresholds
  • With what governance, verification, or termination logic

The membrane is semi-permeable — enabling trust-based exchange, while protecting sovereignty.

Assets and the Flow of Vital Capital

Every Space stewards assets — forms of Vital Capital it holds in trust for its members. These may include:

  • Knowledge, narratives, or software
  • Attention, energy, or care
  • Reputation, alignment, or social permission
  • Natural and material resources — water, food, energy, products

These assets can flow between Spaces through Agreements.
While the MAP holds digital representations of these flows, the flows themselves are real — they track and coordinate exchanges of embodied resources and commitments.

The MAP is not the territory.
But it makes the flows of the territory legible, navigable, and actionable — across people, apps, and ecosystems.

This enables explicit modeling of bioregional flows — of water, food, care, or commons — across a meshwork of human and biological Agents.

It’s the resilience, diversity, and mutuality of these flows that define the wealth and health of the ecosystem.

A Living, Growing Tissue

Spaces don’t sit still.

They divide, merge, specialize, dissolve, or evolve.
New Spaces are born from Promise Weaves.
Social Organisms emerge when coherence and identity reach critical mass.

The MAP is not a static structure.
It is a living tissue of Spaces — a regenerative architecture of trust, agency, and interrelationship.

Why Spaces Matter

Spaces re-center digital architecture around living systems.

They let us:

  • Replace apps with sovereign human contexts
  • Govern ourselves — not be governed by platforms
  • Own and protect our data — in membranes we control
  • Flow capital through relationship — not through extraction
  • Coordinate across biological, cultural, and technical domains

In a world of apps, you’re a user.
In a world of Spaces, you’re a co-creator, a steward, an agent of flow.

To go deeper, explore: