π§ Draft in Progress β This narrative holon is evolving and open for remix.
ποΈ Collective Governance Scaffolds¶
Regenerative trust architectures for Agent Spaces¶
π§ What Is a Governance Scaffold?¶
A Governance Scaffold is a reusable holonic pattern that defines how a Space self-coordinates β how it:
- Makes decisions
- Onboards and off-boards members
- Resolves tensions
- Assigns and rotates roles
- Evolves over time
- Sustains collective intelligence
Governance Scaffolds are not rigid operating systems β they are living, declarative blueprints grounded in consent, trust, and purpose.
In the MAP, governance is scaffolded β not imposed. It arises from relationships, intentions, and shared design.
π§© Why Governance Scaffolds Matter¶
-
Freedom of Choice
Spaces are sovereign. They choose governance models aligned to their unique purpose, makeup, and context. -
Acceleration Without Lock-in
Designing governance from scratch is costly and error-prone. Scaffolds provide ready-to-adapt patterns without restricting autonomy. -
Pluggable Memes and Methods
- The Global Meme Pool provides the governance goals, principles, and models β the memetic source of "what" and "why."
- The Global Service Registry scaffolds their implementation β offering service mapps, templates, and consulting offers to operationalize governance.
-
Living, Regenerative Ecosystem
As Spaces implement, adapt, and remix scaffolds, they feed evolutionary insights back into the commons β strengthening both the Meme Pool and Service Registry.
The Global Meme Pool inspires governance; the Global Service Registry scaffolds it into operational reality.
π Governance Scaffold Structure¶
Each Governance Scaffold is a self-describing Holon that includes:
scaffoldId: Unique identifierdecisionModes: Supported decision logics (e.g., consent, advice, voting)defaultRoles: Recommended roles (steward, weaver, membrane keeper, etc.)onboardingProtocol: How new agents or Spaces joinexitProtocol: Graceful or responsive exit patternsamendmentProcess: How governance evolves over timetensionResolution: Pathways for surfacing and integrating breakdownsrituals: Optional cultural or memetic practices tied to participationappliesPrinciples: References to one or more Core Prosocial Principles
πΏ Grounding Scaffolds in Prosocial Principles¶
MAP Governance Scaffolds are inspired by the Core Prosocial Principles β derived from Elinor Ostromβs research on commons governance and evolved by the Prosocial World community.
By embedding these principles, MAP fosters:
- Psychological safety
- Transparent equity
- Adaptive, resilient structures
- Decentralized, life-aligned governance
π§ The 8 Core Prosocial Principles in MAP Context¶
| Principle | MAP Scaffold Implementation |
|---|---|
| 1. Shared Identity & Purpose | Spaces encode their LifeCode as a memetic signature in the scaffold. |
| 2. Equitable Distribution of Costs & Benefits | Vital Capital Flows and Sustainability Quotients track reciprocity and balance. |
| 3. Inclusive & Fair Decision-Making | Roles like steward and weaver facilitate processes such as consent rounds and advice protocols. |
| 4. Monitoring Agreed Behaviors | Promise fulfillment, contribution tracking, and role accountability are observable through Trust Channels. |
| 5. Graduated Responses to Misalignment | Tension protocols favor restorative paths: dialogue, pauses, role shifts. |
| 6. Fast & Fair Conflict Resolution | Circles, peer mediation, and conflict rituals transform breakdowns into deeper coherence. |
| 7. Autonomy Within Nested Structures | Every Space is a sovereign Holon β governing itself while linking into larger fractals. |
| 8. Collaborative Relationships with Other Groups | Promise Weaves and shared Agreements enable inter-Space collaboration with clarity and care. |
π Scaffold Examples (With Principle Alignment)¶
1. Consent Circle Scaffold¶
- Principles: 1, 3, 5, 7
- Emphasizes lightweight consent, shared purpose, minimal governance
- Roles: steward, weaver, participant
- Tension resolution: reflective rounds + pause protocols
2. Advice Process Scaffold¶
- Principles: 2, 3, 6, 7
- Any agent may act, but must seek advice from affected parties
- Encourages autonomy while maintaining connectedness
3. Nested Circle Governance¶
- Principles: 1 through 8 (full spectrum)
- Supports complex, scalable organizations through double-linking and clear domains
- Ideal for large fractal Spaces or multi-agent collaborations
π Role Templates in Governance Scaffolds¶
| Role | Function |
|---|---|
steward |
Holds coherence and facilitates governance cycles |
weaver |
Maintains Promise Weaves and cross-role coordination |
membrane keeper |
Manages trust levels, onboarding, and exits |
scribe |
Records agreements, proposals, tensions, and amendments |
participant |
Engages actively in Dances, Promises, governance |
observer |
Witnesses without active roles (e.g., learners, auditors) |
Roles can be fixed, rotating, or entered into via consent and ritual.
π DAHN Integration¶
DAHN modules surface Governance Scaffolds via:
- Governance Console: Roles, proposals, consent flows
- Decision Map: Visualizing scaffold-based decisions and amendments
- Participation Pulse: Measuring engagement, contribution, alignment
- Principle Overview: Scaffolds' alignment with Prosocial Principles
- Tension Board: Tracking, surfacing, and integrating breakdowns
πͺ΄ Evolving Governance Scaffolds¶
Scaffolds are living holons β Spaces may:
- Fork and customize existing scaffolds
- Amend governance protocols over time
- Evolve governance rituals as culture deepens
- Contribute new scaffolds back to the MAP Commons
Every Scaffold Holon includes:
- Machine-readable schema
- Human-readable narrative
- Visual models (e.g., role graphs, governance flows)
- Provenance metadata (origin, adaptations, lineage)
π Summary¶
Governance Scaffolds in MAP allow Spaces to:
- Coordinate with clarity
- Govern with consent
- Adapt with resilience
- Evolve collective wisdom
By rooting governance in the Core Prosocial Principles and making it pluggable, memetic, and sovereign, the MAP enables regenerative cooperation across scales.