Skip to content

🚧 Draft in Progress β€” This narrative holon is evolving and open for remix.

πŸ›οΈ Collective Governance Scaffolds

Regenerative trust architectures for Agent Spaces


πŸ”§ What Is a Governance Scaffold?

A Governance Scaffold is a reusable holonic pattern that defines how a Space self-coordinates β€” how it:

  • Makes decisions
  • Onboards and off-boards members
  • Resolves tensions
  • Assigns and rotates roles
  • Evolves over time
  • Sustains collective intelligence

Governance Scaffolds are not rigid operating systems β€” they are living, declarative blueprints grounded in consent, trust, and purpose.

In the MAP, governance is scaffolded β€” not imposed. It arises from relationships, intentions, and shared design.


🧩 Why Governance Scaffolds Matter

  1. Freedom of Choice
    Spaces are sovereign. They choose governance models aligned to their unique purpose, makeup, and context.

  2. Acceleration Without Lock-in
    Designing governance from scratch is costly and error-prone. Scaffolds provide ready-to-adapt patterns without restricting autonomy.

  3. Pluggable Memes and Methods

    • The Global Meme Pool provides the governance goals, principles, and models β€” the memetic source of "what" and "why."
    • The Global Service Registry scaffolds their implementation β€” offering service mapps, templates, and consulting offers to operationalize governance.
  4. Living, Regenerative Ecosystem
    As Spaces implement, adapt, and remix scaffolds, they feed evolutionary insights back into the commons β€” strengthening both the Meme Pool and Service Registry.

The Global Meme Pool inspires governance; the Global Service Registry scaffolds it into operational reality.


πŸ“ Governance Scaffold Structure

Each Governance Scaffold is a self-describing Holon that includes:

  • scaffoldId: Unique identifier
  • decisionModes: Supported decision logics (e.g., consent, advice, voting)
  • defaultRoles: Recommended roles (steward, weaver, membrane keeper, etc.)
  • onboardingProtocol: How new agents or Spaces join
  • exitProtocol: Graceful or responsive exit patterns
  • amendmentProcess: How governance evolves over time
  • tensionResolution: Pathways for surfacing and integrating breakdowns
  • rituals: Optional cultural or memetic practices tied to participation
  • appliesPrinciples: References to one or more Core Prosocial Principles

🌿 Grounding Scaffolds in Prosocial Principles

MAP Governance Scaffolds are inspired by the Core Prosocial Principles β€” derived from Elinor Ostrom’s research on commons governance and evolved by the Prosocial World community.

By embedding these principles, MAP fosters:

  • Psychological safety
  • Transparent equity
  • Adaptive, resilient structures
  • Decentralized, life-aligned governance

🧠 The 8 Core Prosocial Principles in MAP Context

Principle MAP Scaffold Implementation
1. Shared Identity & Purpose Spaces encode their LifeCode as a memetic signature in the scaffold.
2. Equitable Distribution of Costs & Benefits Vital Capital Flows and Sustainability Quotients track reciprocity and balance.
3. Inclusive & Fair Decision-Making Roles like steward and weaver facilitate processes such as consent rounds and advice protocols.
4. Monitoring Agreed Behaviors Promise fulfillment, contribution tracking, and role accountability are observable through Trust Channels.
5. Graduated Responses to Misalignment Tension protocols favor restorative paths: dialogue, pauses, role shifts.
6. Fast & Fair Conflict Resolution Circles, peer mediation, and conflict rituals transform breakdowns into deeper coherence.
7. Autonomy Within Nested Structures Every Space is a sovereign Holon β€” governing itself while linking into larger fractals.
8. Collaborative Relationships with Other Groups Promise Weaves and shared Agreements enable inter-Space collaboration with clarity and care.

πŸŒ€ Scaffold Examples (With Principle Alignment)

  • Principles: 1, 3, 5, 7
  • Emphasizes lightweight consent, shared purpose, minimal governance
  • Roles: steward, weaver, participant
  • Tension resolution: reflective rounds + pause protocols

2. Advice Process Scaffold

  • Principles: 2, 3, 6, 7
  • Any agent may act, but must seek advice from affected parties
  • Encourages autonomy while maintaining connectedness

3. Nested Circle Governance

  • Principles: 1 through 8 (full spectrum)
  • Supports complex, scalable organizations through double-linking and clear domains
  • Ideal for large fractal Spaces or multi-agent collaborations

πŸ“š Role Templates in Governance Scaffolds

Role Function
steward Holds coherence and facilitates governance cycles
weaver Maintains Promise Weaves and cross-role coordination
membrane keeper Manages trust levels, onboarding, and exits
scribe Records agreements, proposals, tensions, and amendments
participant Engages actively in Dances, Promises, governance
observer Witnesses without active roles (e.g., learners, auditors)

Roles can be fixed, rotating, or entered into via consent and ritual.


πŸ“Š DAHN Integration

DAHN modules surface Governance Scaffolds via:

  • Governance Console: Roles, proposals, consent flows
  • Decision Map: Visualizing scaffold-based decisions and amendments
  • Participation Pulse: Measuring engagement, contribution, alignment
  • Principle Overview: Scaffolds' alignment with Prosocial Principles
  • Tension Board: Tracking, surfacing, and integrating breakdowns

πŸͺ΄ Evolving Governance Scaffolds

Scaffolds are living holons β€” Spaces may:

  • Fork and customize existing scaffolds
  • Amend governance protocols over time
  • Evolve governance rituals as culture deepens
  • Contribute new scaffolds back to the MAP Commons

Every Scaffold Holon includes:

  • Machine-readable schema
  • Human-readable narrative
  • Visual models (e.g., role graphs, governance flows)
  • Provenance metadata (origin, adaptations, lineage)

πŸ“˜ Summary

Governance Scaffolds in MAP allow Spaces to:

  • Coordinate with clarity
  • Govern with consent
  • Adapt with resilience
  • Evolve collective wisdom

By rooting governance in the Core Prosocial Principles and making it pluggable, memetic, and sovereign, the MAP enables regenerative cooperation across scales.