Skip to content

Case Study: Building Commons-Based Trust with MAP – A Community Commitment Pool for Clean Water

This case study draws inspiration from the work of Will Ruddick, founder of Grassroots Economics, whose Community Inclusion Currency systems and the conceptual model of “Commitment Pools” have informed the design and social logic explored here.

Overview

In a rural village in Kenya, where Community Inclusion Currencies (CICs) like Sarafu circulate to support local exchange, a group of neighbors wants to fund and coordinate the installation of a shared 10,000-liter water tank. Rather than relying on cash, charity, or state provision, they choose to organize themselves — pooling commitments of value in their own currency.

This isn't just a crowdfunding campaign. It's a commons-based commitment system grounded in shared promises, mutual accountability, and collective purpose. How might the Memetic Activation Platform (MAP) support and enable this scenario? MAP is an open-source, open-ended software framework designed to scaffold relational trust, peer governance, and shared meaning-making in digitally networked communities.

The Need: Coordinating Commitments Without a Central Authority

In many mutual credit systems, liquidity and trust bottlenecks emerge when projects require upfront contributions. Community members may be willing to commit resources (like Sarafu), but only if there's a trustworthy mechanism to ensure:

  • Conditions are met (e.g., the tank is installed).
  • Funds are not misused.
  • Contributors are recognized, not just as donors but as co-producers of the commons.

The community needs a commitment pool — a way to conditionally pledge value toward a shared goal and release it only once verifiable milestones are met.

The Solution: A MAP-Based Commitment Pool

MAP allows the community to create an Offer: a digitally signed declaration of intent from a project initiator (e.g., Asha, a respected local coordinator), inviting others to contribute value under clearly defined conditions.

Here's how it works:

  1. Asha creates a digitally signed Offer, stating:

    • The goal: fund a water tank installation.
    • The conditions: 10,000 SARAFU must be pledged, and the installation must be verified by a group of trusted neighbors.
    • The reciprocation: contributors gain recognition and trust in future projects.

  2. Asha places the offer in a digital community space.

  3. Community members “accept” the Offer, by digitally signing their own commitments:

    • “I will withhold 500 SARAFU for 30 days, contingent on the tank being installed.”

  4. As enough commitments come in, the system forms an Agreement — a mutually acknowledged and digitally verifiable contract — and creates a shared space where all participants in the Agreement interact, track progress, and eventually trigger outcomes.

  5. Validation of the milestone (e.g., the tank being built) comes from designated community validators — neighbors who inspect the site and log their verification by signing a digital declaration.

  6. Optionally, a collective memetic signal acts as a soft consensus layer:

    • A community meme like #WaterIsLife is “activated” once 75% of contributors signal emotional and social readiness — a digital ritual for cultural closure.

  7. Once all conditions are met, the system:

    • Releases the committed value to Asha.
    • Logs the success.
    • Updates reputations of participants based on fulfilled commitments.
    • Publishes a narrative to the community’s shared storytelling space.

The Role of Technology: Trust Infrastructure, Not Control

MAP is built on Holochain, which shares some of blockchain’s cryptographic tools — like digital signatures, Merkle trees, and tamper-proof data structures — but avoids the global consensus model.

Instead:

  • Each Agreement and project lives in its own agent space.
  • All Offers and Agreements are expressed in a three-tier structure:
    • Human-readable (so villagers can read and understand them).
    • Machine-executable (so the system can process them).
    • Optionally, legal-formal (so they can interface with institutional frameworks).
  • Everything is cryptographically signed, ensuring that records are verifiable, authorship is provable, and forgery is infeasible — but without requiring a single ledger or a mining network.

Commons Logic, Digitally Expressed

This is not just digital infrastructure. It’s a commons logic expressed in programmable form:

  • Promises, not contracts: social commitments precede legal enforcement.
  • Mutual recognition, not algorithmic control: agents acknowledge each other’s commitments, backed by signatures, not surveillance.
  • Narrative and reputation, not scarcity: when the tank is installed, the community doesn’t just check a box — they activate a story, anchored in shared symbols and reinforced by public recognition.
  • Forkable governance: if a group wants to run a similar pool for a school roof instead of a water tank, they can fork the Offer and modify the conditions — the software supports composability and pluralism, not monoculture. Proven Offer Types and Governance Scaffolds can be stewarded in the Global Meme Pool. This promotes "one-click" reuse of proven patterns that allow the collective wisdom of the group to be preserved and leveraged.

Why This Matters for Commoning

From a commoning perspective, this case illustrates how relational trust can be scaffolded by lightweight, verifiable digital infrastructure — without surrendering autonomy to markets or states, or to algorithmic logics of extraction.

Instead, MAP supports:

  • Trust built over time, recorded not in transactions but in fulfilled promises.
  • Flexible governance, driven by context-specific agreements.
  • Shared meaning-making, where memes, symbols, and stories carry as much weight as numeric ledgers.

It provides a way to digitally coordinate value commitments, without reducing value to money, and without ceding control to opaque platforms.

Conclusion: Trust Is the First Protocol

This case shows what’s possible when we stop assuming that “trustless” infrastructure is the goal. With MAP, trust is not eliminated — it’s honored, contextualized, and made resilient through social and cryptographic means.

In a world of extractive platforms and brittle bureaucracies, this is a glimpse of something else: infrastructure for the commons, rooted in people, promises, and shared purpose — not in profit, platforms, or centralized power.